Week 30: Contemporary Trend in New Zealand or Internationally


As a Digital Technologies teacher, the trend that is the most relevant to my practice is the uptake in Coding as Literacy and the changes the adoption of Digital Technology as a curriculum in England, Australia and New Zealand schools is making into our classrooms.

I have become aware what the requirements of this curriculum and the need to develop an understanding of Coding for the past five years through the increase in opportunities for my students such as #SHE; Code Club; Computer Science Unplugged.

The drivers of change in the rapid increase in knowledge I need to adopt in my teaching are Professor Tim Bell and his team at the University of Canterbury and Associate Professor Peter Andreae and his team at Victoria University. Their vision of providing the CS4HS (Computer Science for High Schools) conferences for Digital teachers has allowed us to adopt the new Digital Technology Curriculum (Hangarau Matihiko) with a relatively smooth transition. Tim Bell’s vision of the Computer Science Field Guide, is a wealth of training for teachers to spring board from. The Code Club resources have also been developed to assist teachers to adapt their practice to assist the upskilling of their students in Computational Thinking.

The use of digital tools is the pathway that we use to assist in the presentation of the Digital Curriculum, but my concern is that educators take shortcuts and don’t understand the work that is required to develop ‘Computational Thinking’ in students and the focus in learning that is required to grow a student’s brain.  The Digital Technologies Curriculum is not about how to use the tools but using the digital tools to assist learning.

Every hour I have with students in front of me is precious. How can I as a teacher make sure that this time is used in such a way that students are stretched, and their thirst for learning is never satisfied? As Bill Gates has said this is ‘an incredible time to be a learner’.

The opportunities I have is to expose our small rural town students to life outside their door, outside New Zealand. For example, using Google Glasses with the ‘Expeditions’ phone app or to learn the full power of Microsoft 365 – the online courses that Microsoft has for the Innovative Educator allow me to upskill at home and expose my students to fabulous opportunities the next day.

We are extremely fortunate in our school with the Digital Technology infrastructure we have.  The sorts of barriers that are preventing this growth of knowledge are: chromebooks not logging onto the school system every time, students forgetting passwords, changes in staff, and when we adopt BYOD that students/families will need to bring a laptop that is, in excess of $500. This may be a bridge too far for some families.

The changes I will adopt in the next two years will be to upskill in ‘Computational Thinking’ to support my Year 9 and 10 students. To budget and purchase a variety of robots and materials for a maker space. Also, to consider will be, how we can change the physical environment we have to allow our department the flexibility to develop some kind of MLE (Modern Learning Environment) as our tables are fixed and allow our students to engage in more group work rather than the individualised silo learning that is common practice in our Digital classroom, because of the limitations of our furniture permanence.

These are some of the most exciting times in education I have experienced.

References:

Bill Gates interview: How the world will change by 2030

Retrieved from: The Verge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RETFyDKcw0

 

CS Education Research Group: Canterbury University: Computer Science Field Guide

Retried from: http://csfieldguide.org.nz/

 

The New Zealand Digital Technologies Curriculum

Retrieved from: http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Teaching/Curriculum-areas/Digital-Technologies-in-the-curriculum

 

 

 

 

 






Comments

  1. Hi Carolyn
    Your comment regarding BYOD is interesting. We went through the same thoughts when we made that decision a few years ago. Initially many staff had reservations because of that financial barrier and the have vs have not culture that could eventuate from it. With the support of Innes Kennard (providing specialist ipad teacher support) we were able to discuss, think, read articles and come to the general conclusion that the move would be beneficial to all as each one who brought their own device reduced demand on school devices. The plan was to increase the number in each class until there was 1 between 2 at least. It has evolved over the past few years, as we have opened it to all devices not just ipads. Anyway, on reflection it has been a worth while venture, especially with teachers doing Mindlab and using their devices in new ways.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 28 Influence of Law and Ethics in Practice